Best Non Gamstop Casinos UK
VAM logo
Publications
Training & Education
Reference Materials
Proficiency Testing
Vam Programme
Sector Networks
Surveys
Links

Site Map
Registration


Go!

HomepageAbout VAMAdvice & InfoLatest NewsCommunitiesContact Us

< back     Publications | Publications Search | Publication: VAM Item  

Alternative Amplification Techniques (Final Report)

Date: 30/09/2000 Ref No: LGC/VAM/2000/076 Type: Report
Author(s): Birch L, Dawson C
Organisation/Publisher: LGC

This report specifically details the research projects that were undertaken to investigate factors influencing the validity, reliability and reproducibility of nucleic acid amplification techniques that offer an alternative to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).  Nucleic acid amplification techniques are key in enabling sufficient analytical sensitivity to be obtained in a number of applications.  Their reliability and reproducibility has, however, been questioned, particularly when applied to more complex food and environmental samples.  Following on from a previous report (Cornett, 1998), which reviewed the range of alternative amplification technologies available, two methodologies were chosen for study; (1) The Ligase Chain reaction (LCR) and (2) Nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA).

The LCR project was designed to detect single base mutations in the M. tuberculosis rpoB gene, that confer resistance to the antibiotic rifampicin.  The model system consisted of nine pGEM-T Easy plasmid stocks, 8 of which carried different mutations in a 750 bp fragment of the rpoB gene from M. tuberculosis, and one of which carried a 257 bp fragment of the wild-type rpoB gene, covering the highly polymorphic region of interest.  Probes flanking the mutation junction were designed to detect the various point mutations.  Detection of ligation products was performed using agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining.  Using this model system, we were unable to prevent template-independent ligation.  As a result, false positive signals were consistently obtained from wild-type template DNA.  A number of strategies were undertaken to overcome this problem, none of which proved successful in our hands (see appendix 3).  As a result a decision was taken to draw a line under the LCR project and concentrate effort into the second alternative amplification technique chosen for study, NASBA.

The aim of the NASBA project was revised to explore the potential applicability of NASBA, as compared to RT-PCR and PCR for the differentiation of viable and non-viable bacteria.  This revision was discussed and fully endorsed by Professor Sandy Primrose.  Verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) is a food and water borne pathogen of increasing public health significance, and the study was designed to investigate the specific detection of E. coli O157, currently the most commonly isolated verotoxigenic serotype.  This work forms the main body of the report.  Two genes were chosen for amplification studies, that were specific for the E. coli O157:H7 serogroup, and thus may be utilised to detect all such isolates.  The target loci were fliC, a flagella gene encoding the H antigen and rfbE, which encodes a cell wall lipopolysaccharide gene.  The sensitivity and specificity of the three amplification techniques were first assessed.  All three techniques were demonstrated to be specific.  Of the three techniques, we found NASBA to be the most sensitive, followed by PCR and then RT-PCR.  To determine the applicability of each method for measuring cell viability, E. coli O157 were killed by three different methods; (1) by heat killing and (2) by metabolic inhibition utilising sodium azide and (3) by reduction in water activity using sodium chloride treatment.  The persistence of mRNA and DNA in these cells was then investigated by using NASBA, RT-PCR and PCR.  We found that the correlation between NASBA detection and cell viability depends on the mRNA target, the method of cell death, post-treatment storage conditions and other environmental factors.  The results demonstrated that nucleic acid detection methods may be used as an indicator of potential cell viability, although the presence of a positive signal should be confirmed by culture methods as unequivocal interpretation is not possible.



 Contents:
Publications
Overview
Search Publications
Show Basket
 DownLoad Article:
Please log in or register to download this publication

Price: £0.00 Please log in or register to download this publication
Email this page to a friend >

Homepage | About VAM | Latest News | Communities | Advice & Information | Contact Us
Privacy Statement | Publications | Training & Education | Reference Materials | Proficiency Testing
Bio-Measurement | Links | Site Map | Registration | Terms Of Use

The VAM Web site has been developed by LGC under contract with the UK Department of Trade and Industry as part of the National Measurement System's Valid Analytical Measurement programme.

©2001 LGC Limited.
All trademarks acknowledged. All rights reserved.
Website design by redweb Limited

Additional resources